Policy Level Continuum — click any level to filter the directory
4
3.3%
Level 1
Pro-Innovation / AI Encouraged
34
27.9%
Level 2
Guided Integration
54
44.3%
Level 3
Conditional / Teacher-Directed
21
17.2%
Level 4
Restrictive / Integrity-Focused
9
7.4%
Level 5
Prohibited / No Use
44.3%
Sitting at Level 3, the cautious middle
Conditional / teacher-directed
24.6%
Actively restricting or prohibiting AI use
Levels 4 and 5 combined
10.7%
Reference state guidance in their policy
Despite 63% in states with official guidance
13
Confirmed board-adopted policies
Likely an undercount
Policy Level by Region
L1 Pro-Innovation
L2 Guided
L3 Conditional
L4 Restrictive
L5 Prohibited
Policy Audience
State Guidance Status
63% of organizations are in states with official AI guidance, yet only 10.7% explicitly reference it in their own policy documents.
Board Adopted vs. District Guidance
Avg. Level: Board Adopted vs. Not
Board-adopted policies average 0.4 levels more permissive, suggesting formal governance correlates with more intentional AI integration.
Average Policy Level by State — minimum 3 organizations — click to filter
Blue = More Permissive
Amber = middle
Red = more restrictive